Influence of the mortar placement method on the uniaxial compression behavior of hollow concrete blocks

  • Ramón García-Cedeño Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León
  • José Álvarez-Pérez Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León
  • Milena Mesa-Lavista Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6966-1590
  • Franco A Carpio-Santamaría Universidad Veracruzana
  • Jorge Humberto Chávez-Gómez Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León
  • Ricardo González-Alcorta Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León
  • G Fajardo-San Miguel Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21041/ra.v15i1.703
Keywords: masonry, hollow concrete blocks, mortar placement

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate how capping placement affects the uniaxial compressive behavior of hollow concrete blocks. Two placement methods were analyzed: 1) on the gross area and 2) on the lateral faces. An experimental program and statistical analysis were conducted to identify significant differences between the methods. The results showed that blocks capped on the lateral faces exhibited a 12.5% decrease in load capacity and an 11.33% decrease in stiffness compared to those capped on the gross area. This study focuses on hollow concrete blocks and concludes that using a variable denominator leads to a misinterpretation of their strength.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Álvarez-Pérez, J., et al., Multifactorial behavior of the elastic modulus and compressive strength in masonry prisms of hollow concrete blocks. Construction and Building Materials, 2020. 241: p. 18.
2. Mohamad, G., P.B. Lourenço, and H.R. Roman, Mechanics of hollow concrete block masonry prisms under compression: Review and prospects. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2007. 29(3): p. 181-192.
3. Caldeira, F.E., et al., Influence of joint thickness and strength of mortars on the compressive behavior of prisms made of normal and high-strength concrete blocks. Construction and Building Materials, 2020. 234: p. 117419.
4. Zahra, T., J. Thamboo, and M. Asad, Compressive strength and deformation characteristics of concrete block masonry made with different mortars, blocks and mortar beddings types. Journal of Building Engineering, 2021. 38: p. 102213.
5. Sarhat, S.R. and E.G. Sherwood, The prediction of compressive strength of ungrouted hollow concrete block masonry. Construction and Building Materials, 2014. 58: p. 111-121.
6. Zahra, T. and M. Dhanasekar, Characterisation and strategies for mitigation of the contact surface unevenness in dry-stack masonry. Construction and Building Materials, 2018. 169: p. 612-628.
7. NMX-ONNCCE-C-036, RESISTENCIA A LA COMPRESIÓN DE BLOQUES, TABIQUES O LADRILLOS Y TABICONES Y ADOQUINES– MÉTODO DE ENSAYO. 2013. p. 10.
8. ACI-530-13, Building Code Requirements and Specification for Masonry Structures and Companion Commentaries, in TMS 602-13/4CI 530.1-13/ASCE 6-13. 2013. p. S-1-S-85.
9. S304.1-04, Design of masonry structures, in Canadian standards association. 2004. p. 139.
10. 4456, A.N.-. Mansory Units and Segmental Pavers and Flags-Methods of test, Standards Australia, Sydney. 2003.
11. NTC-M, Complementary technical standards for design and construction of masonry structures (in Spanish) (mexican masonry code), in Gaceta Oficial del Distrito Federal, Tomo I, N°.103-BIs. 2017. p. 284.
12. NMX-ONNCCE-C-464, DETERMINACIÓN DE LA RESISTENCIA A COMPRESIÓN DIAGONAL Y MÓDULO DE CORTANTE DE MURETES, ASÍ COMO DETERMINACIÓN DE LA RESISTENCIA A COMPRESIÓN Y MÓDULO DE ELASTICIDAD DE PILAS DE MAMPOSTERÍA DE ARCILLA O DE CONCRETO .MÉTODOS DE ENSAYO 2010. p. 24.
13. Lima, T.E.S., et al. Study of Face Shell Bedding Concrete Blocks Prisms with Different Laying Mortar Strength. in Characterization of Minerals, Metals, and Materials 2021. 2021. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
14. ASTM-C-140-17A, Standard test methods for sampling and testing concrete masonry units and related units. 2017. p. 26.
15. ASTM-C-1552, Standard Practice for Capping Concrete Masonry Units, Related Units and Masonry Prisms for Compression Testing. 2016.
16. Association, C.S., S304.1-04. Desing of masonry structures. 2014.
17. Barbosa, C.S. and J.B. Hanai, STRENGTH AND DEFORMABILITY OF HOLLOW CONCRETE BLOCKS AND THEIR CORRELATIONS WITH MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF CONSTITUENT MATERIAL, in 10th Canadian Masonry Symposium. 2005: Banff, Alberta, June p. 8-12.
18. Barbosa, C.S. and J.B. Hanai, Resistência e deformabilidade de blocos vazados de concreto e suas correlações com as propriedades mecânicas do material constituinte Cadernos de Engenharia de Estruturas, 2006. 8(34): p. 45-74.
19. García, J.M., R.L. Bonett, and C. Ledezma, Analytical Model for Compression Behavior of Hollow Concrete Blocks (In Spanich). Revista de la construcción, 2013. 12(3): p. 76-82.
20. Nalon, G.H., et al., Review of recent progress on the compressive behavior of masonry prisms. Construction and Building Materials, 2022. 320: p. 126181.
21. Henrique Nalon, G., et al., Strength and failure mechanisms of masonry prisms under compression, flexure and shear: Components’ mechanical properties as design constraints. Journal of Building Engineering, 2020. 28: p. 101038.
22. Montgomery, D.C. and G.C. Runger, Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers. Third Edition, ed. T. Edition. 2003, Third Edition: Printed in the United States of America.
23. SPSS, I., IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0., N.Y. Armonk, Editor. 2017.
Published
2025-01-01
How to Cite
García-Cedeño , R., Álvarez-Pérez, J., Mesa-Lavista, M., Carpio-Santamaría, F. A., Chávez-Gómez, J. H., González-Alcorta, R., & Fajardo-San Miguel, G. (2025). Influence of the mortar placement method on the uniaxial compression behavior of hollow concrete blocks. Revista ALCONPAT, 15(1), 1 - 18. https://doi.org/10.21041/ra.v15i1.703
Issue
Vol. 15 No. 1 (2025): Volume 15, Issue 1 (2025)
Section
Basic Research

Copyright (c) 2025 García-Cedeño, R., Álvarez-Pérez, J., Mesa-Lavista, M., Carpio-Santamaría, F. A., Chávez-Gómez, J. H., González-Alcorta, R., Fajardo-San Miguel, G.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

_______________________________

License in effect from September 2020

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC